The Economist on Brazil inflation

Growth rates and interest rates not fully aligned in Brazil? An issue for Brazil’s leadership: 


Inflation in Brazil

Behind the curve

The Central Bank acts belatedly to bring prices back under control

A CENTRAL bank knows it has lost control of inflation expectations when price rises become the subject of running gags. In Brazil the jokes feature tomatoes, which have suddenly become very pricey following floods, droughts and a big increase in freight costs. Social-media sites buzz with cartoons of bank robbers making off with crates of tomatoes and lottery winners bathing in purée. Even organised crime is diversifying into fruit: customs officers say that Paraguayan smugglers have added Argentine tomatoes to their Brazil-bound trade in drugs, cigarettes and knock-off electronics.

Official figures published on April 10th show that Brazil’s inflation problem goes well beyond salad. Prices rose by 6.6% during the past year, breaching the two-point tolerance band around the Central Bank’s 4.5% target. The price of more than two-thirds of the items used to calculate inflation rose in the past month. Now the mockery seems to have spurred the bank to act. On April 17th it raised the base interest-rate by 0.25 points, to 7.5%. Market watchers expect rates to hit 8.5% by the year’s end.

The belated rise comes just as it has sunk in that Brazil’s economy is failing to regain momentum after stalling last year. Fewer new jobs are being created. Industrial production and an economic-activity index widely seen as a leading indicator of GDP growth both fell in February after rising in January. Core retail sales fell for the first time in almost a decade, a particularly worrying sign given that only domestic consumption kept Brazil out of recession in 2012.

One reason the Central Bank gave for holding rates steady for so long was that inflation was being stoked by transient pressures such as a weaker currency and spiking food prices. Once those fed through, price rises would naturally moderate, it argued. The bank may also have been waiting to see if cuts in sales taxes on electricity, food, white goods and cars would hold back inflation, as the finance ministry argued they would.

More orthodox economists now feel vindicated in their predictions that automatic inflation-matching adjustments to wages, rents, professional fees and much else (a legacy of the country’s hyperinflationary past) would see price shocks ripple through the wider economy. As for the tax cuts, they seem to have fanned demand, buoying prices.

The belated interest-rate rise suggests that the bank recognises it needs to regain some lost credibility. Its operational independence has been in question since August 2011, when it cut rates even though inflation had reached 7.1%—and kept cutting even though inflation remained above target (see chart). Dilma Rousseff, the president, has trumpeted low interest rates as a “conquest” by her government ever since. Days before the bank’s monetary-policy meeting Guido Mantega, the finance minister, said that tackling inflation no longer required heavy artillery, as in the past.

Many analysts have concluded that the government was pressing the bank to keep rates low, with an eye to supporting Brazil’s weak economy. Nomura Securities, a broker, identifies a shift in mid-2011 in the relation between inflation expectations and subsequent interest-rate moves. The bank’s actions since then seem geared towards a tacit target-rate of somewhere between 5.5% and 6.5%, rather than the official 4.5% target, Nomura says.

As the tomato jokes suggest, Brazilians are still alert to inflation. A government that fails to keep it at bay can expect short shrift at the ballot box, especially from the poor, who are particularly sensitive to rising prices. A sub-index showing that inflation as experienced by those on modest wages is running well above general inflation will worry the government. Monetary policy generally takes six to nine months to take effect. If the government decides it would be best to get the pain over with before campaigning starts for elections in 2014, any future pressure it puts on the Central Bank may be upward.


About Janar Wasito

Janar Wasito is the manager of Magis Capital in San Diego, CA. He is a graduate of Harvard and Stanford Law School, and a former Marine Officer.
This entry was posted in Brazil. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Economist on Brazil inflation

  1. “Monetary policy generally takes six to nine months to take effect.” Thank God the developed world was aware of this economic fact: This was no doubt unshakable belief policy makers when they promptly and aggressively nipped the global financial crisis and economic slump in the bud during 2008, 2009, 2010, … . Oh wait … . :- )

    One of the more interesting aspects of neo-Keynesian economic policies as recently practiced in developed countries is that they have been desperately trying to induce some kind of price inflation that will result in increased consumer spending (as opposed to government spending) via a strong incentive not to hold cash and deposits (see arguments by James Rickards to this effect). What’s most remarkable is that real interest rates in a large part of the developed world seem to be negative at present, and yet people still seem desperate to hold cash/deposits despite earning no return. So much for inducing a consumer demand-led recovery. Dear Old Milton Keynes apparently knew a thing or two … or perhaps neo-Keynesians do not.

    Sadly, despite out-sized growth in monetary aggregates, money velocity continues to fall or remain stagnant; apparently leaving only government spending to pick up the slack in consumer demand. Also sadly, governments don’t spend on the same things as consumers (e.g., governments are not large buyers of fixtures, furniture, appliances, autos, etc.), so the government spending potentially redirects investment in a way that can have long-term negative effects on the economy.

    The article seems to suggest that Brazil’s over-target inflation rate is a crisis of some sort. Interestingly, Brazil’s inflation rate has been in a fairly stable, rough 2% band around a 6% rate for the last 9 years. To put this in perspective, the US inflation rate has been in a somewhat less stable, rough 2% band around a 4% rate for the last 9 years. Oh my! Brazil’s inflation is out of control just like we predicted (you know those Latin American countries, what with their fiscal irresponsibility and all).

    Hmmm. Well, maybe Brazil’s inflation rate isn’t completely crazy (even if it is on average an eyebrow-raising 2% above the US inflation rate over the last 9 years), but what about economic growth? After all, we all know the real economic growth powerhouses are in the developed world. Comparing US and Brazilian GDP growth over the same 9 year period, US GDP grew about 22% and Brazilian GDP grew about 175%. Since 2008, US GDP has grown by about 3% and Brazilian GDP has grown by about 64%.

    Ah well, there we have it; the data is quite clear: Brazil is floundering in misguided economic policies. Thank God the developed world is stepping up and showing the lesser developed world how to be fiscally-responsible and avoid financial crises and economic slumps. If only Brazil would—please, for the sake of the children!—follow the developed world’s economic policy, Brazil would be saved from its dark, dark fate.

    Cheers, MMc

    P.S. It really seems there should be some kind of attribution given to an article quoted in its entirety from “The Economist”. Given the developed world’s strict enforcement of intellectual property rights, I have visions of an army of barristers showing up in Brazil to shut down until and unless a large monetary settlement in favor of “The Economist” is paid in US Dollars (not Brazilian Reais, dear Madams and Sirs: Brazil is engaging in massive currency devaluation of 6% to 8% per year!). Just kidding. MMc


    • Apologies and a correction: ‘My statement “P.S. It really seems there should be some kind of attribution given to an article quoted in its entirety from “The Economist”.’ was in error and is hereby withdrawn with apologies. I was negligent in interpreting the title ‘The Economist on Brazil Inflation’ due apparently to late night brain fog. Cheers, MMc


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s